What is Dharma?|What is Secularism?|Watch Shrimad Bhagwad Geeta video|Arun Shourie reveals secrets of CONgress|
Why is 'secular' Government of India controling operations of Hindu temples but not Mosques and Churches?|Skeletons in CONgress's closet

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

What about the REAL Taliban amongst us?

Spread The Word











Ask yourself today, "What about the REAL Taliban amongst us Bharatvaasi (misnomer: Indians)?" And I don't mean the fake Taliban and calls of Talibanization doodled by Anti-Hindu chauvinist & bombastic Renuka Chowdhury but the real Radical Islamic Taliban Terrorists or those who follow its Talibani fundamentalist & extremist ideology in Bharat (misnomer: India) especially against Hindus. Just like Dhimmi Sardar making nonsecular communal claims that Muslims have first right on India and Indian resources. Not poor, not Dareedra Narain (really poor citizens), not Dalit, not SC, not ST, not Indian, not Hindu, not Sikh, not Jain but only Muslims. Why? Why appease Muslims and divide nation, again, on the basis of religion? If this is their secularism then it s**ks! Bhay HO!

Check out Taliban and Talibani ideology followers in Bharat:

Hi-tech terrorists ready to strike India
There is a new enemy at the gate. Equipped with GPS systems, satellite phones, detailed maps, winter clothing and, of course, top-notch weaponry. He is "well-trained and motivated" for a head-on confrontation with security forces. And he does not come alone or in small batches.

The alert seems well founded with BSF detecting 1000-odd bunkers constructed by Pakistan Rangers across the international border in Jammu. "These bunkers would certainly help infiltrators enter India from Poonch and Akhnoor centres," said K Rajendra, IDP, Jammu zone. BSF officers said they felt points of ingress could the Chicken neck area, Palanwala, Pargwal, Abdullian, Kanachak and Sawzian.

"There are intelligence inputs that Lashkar-e-Taiba militants might try to sneak across the IB through the fenced border the way they did in Kanachak area in Jammu sector last year," said an official. There were also speculation about Taliban men infiltrating into Kashmir but this is denied by top officials in Delhi.

Officials say the ``tactical'' aim of militants trying to infiltrate into J&K is to disrupt the Lok Sabha polls in the valley, in particular, which stretch from April 16 to May 13. At the same time, the possibility of terrorists gaining quick access through Rajasthan and Punjab to launch terror strikes in the mainland is not ruled out.

-----deleted-----
============================

Video of Taliban Terrorists entering Bharat (misnomer: India)

============================

Forget Swat, fear Taliban amid us by Kanchan Gupta
There is, we are told, disquiet among Muslims over Justice Markandey Katju’s comment, “We don’t want to have Taliban in the country”, while rejecting the petition filed by Mohammad Salim, a student of Nirmala Convent Higher Secondary School in Madhya Pradesh, for quashing the school’s regulation requiring students to be clean shaven. The student’s counsel, Mr BA Khan, a retired judge, argued that Article 25 of the Constitution guaranteed protection to Salim to pursue his religious practice of keeping a beard and the school regulation was violative of the right to freedom of religion. He said forcing the student to shave his beard was against “his religious conscience, belief and custom of his family”. Mr Khan, who made an elaborate case linking the student’s faith and his beard, does not sport one himself. This prompted Justice Katju to point out, “But you don’t sport a beard!”

While rejecting Mohammad Salim’s petition, and rightly so, the Supreme Court bench made two points. First, if Salim found the school’s rules abhorrent and unacceptable, he could join some other institution. “But you can’t ask the school to change the rules for you.” Second, “If there are rules, you have to obey. You can’t say that I will not wear a uniform I will (wear) only a burqa.” Justice Katju’s comment, “We don’t want to have Taliban in the country”, was presumably directed against those who wish to imitate the Taliban and their subversion of the secular state and destruction of civil society in the name of practising Islam and enforcing Islamic injunctions.

This week we had a glimpse of what that means, thanks to a two-minute video shot with a cellphone in Pakistan’s Swat Valley and smuggled out by those who are alarmed by the prospect of the Taliban’s ruthless enforcement of “religious conscience, belief and custom”. The video showed a 17-year-old girl, a resident of Kabal, being held face down on the ground by men while a Taliban commander flogged her with a leather strap. The girl kept on pitifully begging for mercy and screaming in pain — “Leave me for the moment... you can beat me again later...” But this did not have the slightest impact on her tormentors: The flogging continued as a large group of men stood around, watching intently at this public display of Islamic fervour.



The girl was punished, the Taliban claimed, in accordance with shari’ah for stepping out of her house without being escorted by a male family member. But this may not be the real reason: Another account said she was falsely accused of violating shari’ah after she refused to marry a local Taliban commander.

-----deleted-----

Ironically, the ‘peace agreement’ has been endorsed by the US in preparation of President Barack Hussein Obama opening negotiations with the ‘good Taliban’. Just how good the ‘good Taliban’ is has been shockingly exposed, though not for the first time, by the smuggled video of a teenaged girl being flogged. For those who may still nurse doubts, here’s some more visual evidence: The photograph published along with this article shows a young Taliban fighter with the hands of a man that were chopped off for an unstated crime. In the land of shari’ah, these would be considered no less than trophies to be proud of.

It is this Taliban and Talibani mindset that we should be scared of; both are already there in our midst. Mohammad Salim is not alone in wanting to emulate those who flaunt their “religious conscience, belief and custom” to the exclusion of a secular state’s enlightenment. What the Taliban are practising in Swat Valley and in the wastelands of Afghanistan is being preached by mullahs in India. And they are doing so openly. A casual reading of the fatwas listed on Darul Uloom Deoband’s Website, http://www.darulifta-deoband.org, will prove this point. Here are some randomly selected examples:

Fatwa 1587/1330=L/1429: “The best purdah for woman is that the palms and no part of her body and adornments is exposed, ie, the whole body is covered from head to toe. If it is possible to see through the purdah, then the eyes also should be covered...”

Fatwa 1141/1141=M/1429: Family planning is haram and unlawful in Islam. You should apprise your wife of the commandment of shari’ah...”

Fatwa 691/636=D/1429: It is not a good thing for women to do jobs in offices. They will have to face strange men (non-mahram) though in veil. She will have to talk and deal with each other which are the things of fitna (evils).”

Fatwa 1386/227=TL/1429: “It is unlawful for women to go out after applying perfume.”

From here to chopping off the thumbs of women who use nail varnish is a very small step.
============================

Video: Muslim extremists beat woman at Mumbai Mall

============================

Supreme Court tells Muslims "Stop Talibanization"

============================

Video: Through the biased prism of Indian media

============================

Video: Congress corruption: Bribe Muslims after attacking Hindus

During Holy Hindu festival Holi celebration, a mob of radical Muslims threw stones and bricks on Hindus and also destroyed public property. Sounds awfully like the following, literally a stone aged cult.



What did Congress do? The unethical and immoral Anti-Hindu sitting Congress MP, Rajesh Mishra gave money on camera to the Muslim Rioters who started the communal riots in the first place. This is their Talibani Secularism.

============================

India Elections 2009 - Rahul Gandhi’s phoney love for the poor

============================

Anti-Hindu Hate speech by Lalu Prasad Yadav and Andhra Pradesh Congress chief D Srinivas

============================

Moral policing and Biased reporting

============================

Editorial slandering of Hindu symbols by CNN-IBN

============================

Christian Taliban: Hindu Temples set on fire in Silchar

============================

London Bridge is burning down...

============================

NDTV to honor Anti-Hindu bigot MF Hussain

============================

Johann Hari has Hindu Phobia

============================

Missionary agenda of Samuel Reddy, CM of Andhra Pradesh: From the Horse's Mouth

============================

It is Non-Cooperation Movement again after 88 years

============================

Book by Christians abusing Hindu Gods

============================

Buddhadeb’s Taliban Act

============================

Anti-Hindu Karunanidhi spews venom again

============================

Vedanta Kesari Swami Laxmananda Saraswati murdered by Christian Taliban

============================

Communal Anti-Hindu Christians are unmasked

============================

Video: Christian Missionary's radical activities against Hindus in India

============================

Convert Asia next: The Pope lets down secularists

============================

Where was Article 355 before?

============================

Video: Road rage or more? Muslim Extremist assaults an innocent Hindu. (If pseudo-secular media can twist Varun Feroz Nehru-Gandhi's speech from "Point finger at Hindu" to "Raise Hands on Hindus" then why can't I say "Muslim Extremist assaults an innocent Hindu" instead of "Immoral Rowdy Muslim civilian assaults another civilian". Then its a fair game.

No comments: