Hindus Religious Rights suppressed in UK

Intolerant United Kingdom strikes again. Western Taliban suppressing Human and Civil Rights of Hindus by preventing them from freely following or "practicing" their Dharm/Religion.

Hindus lose legal battle over open funeral pyres in UK

The London High Court has turned down a bid by petitioner Davender Ghai, 70, who was seeking to overturn a decision by Newcastle City Council preventing open funeral pyres.

The Council has said the traditional religious practice was impractical.

His lawyers had argued a ban was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

Ghai had once said, "it is my religious right and birth right. I want to have a funeral pyre. I want my son to light my fire and not a gas flame to light me up."

"I shall appeal until the very end, in the faith that my dying wish will not go unheard," said Ghai. "A matter of such magnitude deserves to be heard by the highest courts in our land and I shall not tire until all legal avenues are exhausted."

Ghai has said he believes the practice is a religious right for Hindus, who consider open-air cremations essential to the peace of the soul.

Such cremations are sanctioned by Hindu scriptures, according to the Hindu Council UK, which supports Ghai's case. It says ancient Hindu rites stipulate that the body be cremated by means of a wood-fueled fire in an open-air facility exposed to daylight.

"We want equality, not exceptions," Ghai states on the Web site for his charity, the Anglo-Asian Friendship Society. "No one expects Hindus to marry in a church, so why are Hindu funerals shoehorned through Chapels of Rest designed like Anglican churches?"

"Traditional Religious practice was impractical", WHAT! With all due respect to the courts, who the f**k do these Brits think they are to pass judgments on Hindu religion and practices. They are down right Racists!

Oh so burning in the pyre to join back the nature as five elements, to say the very least, is impractical. But wasting a piece of land by having a $20000 lavish funeral to get buried only to leave behind a huge debt along with a headache for your friends and family is so very practical!

You think one of THE most green way (over at least 22000 years old) to depart from the mother earth for the next life is too traditional for you to swallow but you have no problem with some 1800 years old burdensome way which you think is so easy to follow.

You think wood is used for burning the pyre then what the hell is a coffin made of? Wood and Metal. All of it with a dead body in it takes years to decay and decompose taking up the space which could have been used for other better purposes.

I am not passing any judgments on these Abrahamic religious practices but if you dare hair split Hindu rights and practices then be ready to answer about your ridiculous misdeeds. What right to these so-called "western" "progressive" "21st century" countries have to lecture the oldest civilization in the world and Bharat (misnomer: India) to be "tolerant" towards evangelic and missionaries proselytizing in Bharat by hook or crook when these countries themselves are so biased, intolerant, inconsiderate and nonsecular when it comes to Hindu Rights and liberties? Hypocrites!

Shame on Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh of present Congress government for not standing up for Hindu Rights in UK. Of course Dhimmi Regent Sardar will not loose sleep on this violation of Birth Rights of Hindus or attack on Sikhs by Taliban as it does not involve Muslims or Christians as victims.

Please go to "Google News" for more information on this discrimination.

Please also read,

1. London Bridge is burning down...


2. Johann Hari has Hindu Phobia


3. What about the REAL Taliban amongst us?


4. Christian Taliban: Hindu Temples set on fire in Silchar


5. Missionary agenda of Samuel Reddy, CM of Andhra Pradesh: From the Horse's Mouth

UK: Court bans open-air cremation

Subramanian Swamy assaulted in Madras High Court

What do you get for standing up for the rights of Hindus in Bharat (misnomer: India) especially in Anti-Hindu Pro-LTTE communal bigot Karunanidhi's state of Tamil Nadu? You get what Janata Party president Dr. Subramanian Swamy got as a gratitude for tirelessly working for the cause of Hindus and national integration. In an unprecedented and despicable show of intolerance of some Anti-Brahmin prejudiced & Pro-LTTE terrorists lawyers, a bunch of racist losers, assaulted Dr. Swamy and hurled eggs and invectives on him at the Madras High Court hall in full view of a couple of judges.

Where are the calls for Article 355 now?

Where are the calls to stop Talibanization of Madras/Chennai?

There are severe terror threats to Hindu temples in the country particularly to God Shiv ji's Mandir in Kashi, God Shri Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, God Shri Krishna Mandir in Mathura and other important Mandir in South. There have been news of Tamil Nadu Government scam to grab the Temple lands. Anti-Hindu bigot Karunanidhi's government in collusion with Antonia Maino aka Sonia Gandhi's UPA government have been systematically destroying Hindu heritage from Shri Ram Setu to slandering Hindu Gods. Of course for them, Justice means Vengeance. Recent one is that Anti-Hindu bigot Government is trying to take over prestigious Chidambaram temple. Dr. Swamy is leading the fight in all these important issues including the latest one in which he has opposed the take over of Nataraja temple by Govt.

Opposing the takeover of the administration of the famous Nataraja temple in Chidambaram in Cuddalore district from Dikshitar community by the state government, Janata Party President Dr Subramanian Swamy has said that he would implead himself in an appeal proposed by the Dikshitars challenging a single bench Judge's order paving the way for the government take over.

Swamy contended that the judgement of the High Court was deficient and pointed out that a 1952 ruling by the court had held that it is a 'denominational' temple. This was not challenged further."Hence the single Judge verdict is hit by the doctrine of Res Judicata. The court has not property apprceciated the case," he said.

The court, in its order, rejected the plea of the Dikshitar community that the 1,500 year old temple was a private one and they had 'untrammeled rights'. it also upheld the appointment of an executive officer to administer the temple. Swamy said he was competent to file the petition as he had been a former law minister and handled a number of questions relating to temples and in protection of it before various forums.

Swamy said "a petition is pending before the Parliament petition committee,regarding temple affairs in Andhra Pradesh. I have got vast knowledge of this and have to free temples from the clutches of the government."

He pointed out that there is a fundamental difference between temples and masjids and churches. In temples, after 'Pranaprathishta' is done, the place becomes that of God, while it is not so in the others.

Stating that the charges levelled against Dikshitars have not been proved, he pointed out that there are many temples under the control of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments department, against which there are allegations.

"The government should concentrate on maintaining law and order and developing the economy. Instead they are trying to manage the temple," he said.

Swamy was here to attend a function at the Ramanujam centre in Sastra University.

In such an Anti-Hindu Talibanized India, I agree with Dr. Swamy that there is a dire need for ‘Hindu vote bank’ more than ever before to protect the rights of Hindus and radically demonized Brahmins.

Janata Party leader Subramanian Swamy on Monday said the only way to counter vote-bank policies blindly pursued by governments and political parties was to develop a strong and formidable “Hindu vote bank.” It was the only way to check the “continued neglect and subjugation of Hindus and Hindu temples,” he said.

Dr. Swamy criticised the United Progressive Alliance government for its attempt to “bend over backwards” to protect mosques and churches while showing “utter indifference” to protect the Hindu shrines and sentiments.

He was addressing a convention organised by the Andhra Pradesh Hindu Temples Protection Committee.

Dr. Swamy said that though there were 42 mosques in Ayodhya where no prayers were offered, Muslims were laying claim to the disputed Ram Janmabhoomi alone.

Shame on you Karunanidhi and Government of Bharat!

Such Anti-Hindu Anti-Brahmin racist bigots should be debarred from practicing law and sent off to Sri Lanka to live with LTTE terrorist whom they love so much. They should be booked under treason and sedition charges!

1. Subramanian Swamy assaulted in Madras HC


2. Advocates assault Subramanian Swamy


3. Bench records attack on Swamy


4. Swamy assaulted in court hall


5. Subramanian Swamy assaulted in Madras HC


6. Lawyers hurl eggs at Swamy inside HC hall


7. Rotten egg attack on Swamy


8. Brutal fascism on display in "Rational,Progressive" Tamil Nadu


9. Advocates assault Subramanian Swamy

   Later in the evening, the Bench passed an order that was merely a recap of the incident. They directed the Registry to place a copy of their order before the Acting Chief Justice for appropriate action.
   
   In their order, the judges said that an unruly mob consisting of many advocates entered the court and shouted slogans in support of Sri Lankan Tamils.
   
   Some members assaulted Swamy.
   
   Similarly, some other members assaulted the police constables.
   
   Some threw rotten eggs inside the court hall and shouted filthy slogans. The slogans included `Brahmin dog down down’



10. HC Bench refers lawyers attack on Swamy to acting CJ

    Taking suo motu action, the Bench, in its brief order, narrated the violent incident inside the court hall, stating that a group of advocates entered inside the court hall, raised slogans against Dr Swamy and assaulted him.
    
    They threw eggs on him and abused him, saying ”Papara Naye Veliye Po” (You Brahmin dog...get out of the court), the Bench, comprising Justice P K Misra and Justice K Chandru said.



11. No law and order in Tamilnadu: Swamy


12. HC Bench refers lawyers attack on Swamy to acting CJ


13. Lawyer arrested for pelting eggs at Swamy

    The high court police on Wednesday night arrested a lawyer, Immanuel, in connection with the incident in which a group of lawyers hurled eggs at Janata Party leader Subramanian Swamy inside the Madras high court hall on Tuesday.
    
    Earlier, assistant commissioner of police Khader Moideen lodged a complaint with the city commissioner of police against a group of advocates who had allegedly manhandled him before hurling eggs at Subramanian Swamy inside the high court.
    
    "We have photographs of the incident and we have identified some of the lawyers who led the attack against Subramaniam Swamy and the officer. We have not received any complaint from Subramaniam Swamy yet," a senior police officer said.

    Just take Suo Motto action as it is a cognizable offense, what complaint are these people waiting for? It happened in front of High Court Judges, tens of Police Officers and hundreds of citizens. How many more witnesses do you want?


14. No law and order in TN: Swamy

    Swamy said he would continue to appear in court for cases relating to the attack on his party's Madurai office a few months ago and the Chidambaram dikshithars' appeal against the high court order allowing the takeover of the Nataraja temple by the state government.
    
    He said Tamil Nadu had become a state where the provisions of the Constitution, including the freedom it guaranteed, were not enforceable due to "the atrocities committed by mercenaries of the LTTE". He suspected the hand of some political and radical outfits behind the attack on him.

    Artcile 355 should be implemented and President's rule should be enforced in Tamil Nadu.


15. Subramanian Swamy Wants Prez Rule in TN

    Addressing a press conference here, Dr Swamy said he would approach the Apex Court shortly to complain about the inability of the Tamil Nadu Government to carry out day-to-day administration, as required by the Constitution and call for imposition of President's Rule in the State.
    
    Citing Tuesday's attack against him in front of two Judges, he said even the High Court (HC) premises in the State was not "safe" and prayed to the court to get details about the steps taken by the Centre to dismiss the Tamil Nadu Government for the Constitutional breakdown and establish rule of law in the State.
    
    Dr Swamy would also ask the Supreme Court to seek details about the steps taken by the Central and State Governments for proper functioning of Madras High Court in the State.
    
    He demanded that 25 lawyers, who were responsible for the unruly behaviour inside the Court premises, should be arrested immediately.
    
    Alleging that some of the advocates who attacked him belonged to naxal groups, besides Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), PMK and Dravidar Kazhagam Parties, Dr Swamy demanded they should be debarred from attending the courts.
    
    He said the Indian national flag was burnt at least five times in the State in the recent times, educational institutions were closed and the people being taken for a ride under the pretext of organizing agitations in support of the banned LTTE and wanted to know the steps taken by the government to stop all these things in the State.
    
    The President Rule should be imposed in the State and the next elections held under the direct control of Central security forces, he added.



16. Utter lawlessness and chaos in Madras High Court: Not safe even inside the Court Hall because of so many unruly, lawless advocates -- V.SUNDARAM


17. Police, lawyers clash at Madras HC. For the pictures please click here.

    Pitched battles were fought outside the Madras high court on Thursday afternoon after the police arrested 17 lawyers for attacking Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy.
    
    Lawyers sympathetic to the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) on Tuesday hurled rotten eggs at Swamy inside the court in the presence of the judges and shouted anti-India slogans.



18. Video: Police lathicharge the Pro-Terrorist-LTTE lawyers. These traitors got what they deserve, police ka danda up their LTTE ass.


19. Video: Police, lawyers clash outside Madras HC


20. 150 lawyers protest Madras HC violence, arrested

    Police arrested 150 lawyers in Chennai on Friday as protests continue to disrupt life in the state. The lawyers were taking out a protest march to the Tamil Nadu secretariat over the violence in the Madras High Court on Thursday, when rampaging lawyers and lathi wielding police fought pitched battles. The Tamil Nadu Bar Association president is among those arrested. Courts in Chennai remained closed today and lawyers were seen protesting outside the court premises, as well. Earlier in the day, the issue rocked Tamil Nadu assembly, leading to an en masse eviction of the entire opposition. The opposition was demanding that the question hour be postponed to discuss the mayhem on court premises.



21. HC orders probe, courts shut today

Being transparent, what is that?

So neither the politicians nor the judges want to be in the ambit of Right to Information (RTI) act to declare their and their relatives assets to the people of Bharat (misnomer: India). Earlier PMO had removed a crucial part of the RTI act which allowed citizens to even get the all important File Noting which are crucial to make a decision about the kind of correspondence that goes on between various government departments and observations noted by the government employees on the files. So much for all the hype about being transparent and clean. Might as well just scrap the RTI act all together.

Assets of ministers, kin exempt from RTI: PMO

Judges not bound to disclose their wealth: CJI

'SC stand on judges' assets may harm RTI Act'

I am biased, can't be friend of court: Fali Nariman

He also attached a document expressing his frank views opposing the stand taken by the Chief Justice of India and the SC.

In the annexure, which is a signed letter to the editor of a daily, the noted jurist says, "Judges of the highest court who have powers to life and death over us citizens, judges who can (and do) send people to jail for contempt of its order must - I repeat must - show that they too are amenable to good practice."

The letter adds, "That is how they earn the respect of us commoners. We in India learn by example - never by precept. For judges of the highest court to litigate as to whether or not they should disclose their assets is as bad as judges going to the court on whether it was lawful for income tax to be deducted from the salaries they get! We have good judges, but we need more judicial wisdom."

Judge says: Human rights? 'Terrorists are animals, we need animal rights'

Human rights? 'Terrorists are animals, we need animal rights'

In a clear departure from the view taken by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan on the checks and balances needed to tackle terrorism, a senior judge of the Supreme Court today strongly deplored “how human rights activists carry out protests and hold dharnas, if rights of terror suspects are violated.”

“We speak of upholding human rights. What we are worried is violation of the rights of terrorists, the people who kill innocent people with AK-47 and AK-56 on streets,” said Justice Arijit Pasayat. “He (a terrorist) is not fit to be called a human. He’s an animal so what is required is animal rights.”

Justice Pasayat, No 3 in the court by seniority, added: “Since he (terrorist) destroys the very basis of the citizen in this country...they have to be treated like terrorist and not like ordinary criminals.”

Earlier, Solicitor General G E Vahanvati called for fighting terrorism by non-conventional methods. “We would not be able to fight it by conventional methods,” he said, adding that after the Mumbai attacks, “it is time to show we also know how to fight and not just bark.”

Referring to Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone terrorist caught alive after 26/11 attacks and the “noise” being made for his right to defence, the Solicitor General said, “I don’t agree with it. I don’t have faith in his case. Suppose if I am asked to represent Kasab, how would I do it, when I don’t have faith in his case...if a lawyer is unwilling to represent Kasab, he must not be forced to do so.”

He, too, contradicted the CJI who had said: “We must uphold the right to fair trial for all individuals, irrespective of how heinous their crimes may be. If we accept a dilution of this right, it will count as a moral loss against those who preach hatred and violence.”

Jurist Fali S Nariman called for tightening the criminal justice system to deal with terrorism. In a sharp comment on the political class, Nariman said, “while Home Minister and Law Minister are protected from terrorist offences, public is not. So any more pussy footing on terrorism is not accepted.”

Finally a judge spoke his mind out against the terrorists by speaking in a language that everyone should speak in. He showed the door to some of these fake human rights activists who are nothing but roadblocks in the country's quest to bring these terrorist to the books.