What is Dharma?|What is Secularism?|Watch Shrimad Bhagwad Geeta video|Arun Shourie reveals secrets of CONgress|
Why is 'secular' Government of India controling operations of Hindu temples but not Mosques and Churches?|Skeletons in CONgress's closet
Showing posts with label economy finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economy finance. Show all posts

Sunday, November 27, 2011

TEDxSRM - Swaminathan Gurumurthy - What Today's Youth Can Do

Spread The Word













Little-known till the mid-1980s, this Chennai-based Chartered Accountant shot into the limelight with a series of exposes against Dhirubhai Ambani and Reliance in "The Indian Express". Swaminathan Gurumurthy is an acclaimed writer whose columns have found place on several dailies and periodicals. He is known for his radical views and opinions while his intense combination of words and moods are a testimony of his passion towards raging issues. Gurumurthy's knowledge of economics and accounting principles is outstanding and his articles, though polemical, are always painstakingly well researched and crafted. He is a staunch proponent of the Swadeshi model of economic development and is a leading light of the Swadeshi Jagran Manch (SJM), which is currently spearheading the agitation against some of the economic policies. Besides politics, he also enjoys considerable clout in corporate circles.

Lord Ram as Harry Potter
S Gurumurthy, Daily Pioneer

ASI needs stones to read history and historians need bones to understand it. Neither are there any stones left by Lord Ram, nor do his bones exist. Ironically, certain sections of the UPA were more than willing to buy this ‘secular logic’

It was a drama that lasted less than 48 hours. On September 9, Lord Ram, who existed in the hearts of millions and millions of faithfuls for thousands of years, ceased to exist, and became a myth for the UPA Government. Like a stone thrown at a beehive, this set off a reaction that made the Government run for cover. On September 11, the Congress-led ‘secular’ UPA Government quickly turned round and admitted that Lord Ram was real.

See the sequence to this somersault. On 9/11, the UPA Government told the Supreme Court on oath that Lord Ram was just a myth and Ramayan no more than fable. Besides trashing Lord Ram, the Government had also dismissed Sita, Lakshman, Hanuman and others as just ‘characters’ in the play, Ramayan. The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) told us so, swore the Government.

Left historians welcomed the Government’s stand, calling it ‘objective’. What is the logic that made Lord Ram a myth? That was the logic of stones and bones. ASI needs stones to read history and historians need, in addition, bones to understand it. Neither does any stone left by Lord Ram, nor does any bone of Lord Ram, exist. So, they ask, how could Lord Ram have existed without the bone-stone testimony.

Human beings do not matter to ASI. And historians cannot accept that human beings are as objective as bones and stones are. So, oral traditions of human beings are no evidence to either of them. On this bone-stone objective test, Valmiki and Tulsidas, the Government told the Supreme Court, are all like Joanne K Rowling. And Lord Ram, just another Harry Potter, the character Rowling has created. Reports say that the Government had filed over 400 pages of records to assert this. But why did the Government try to make a Harry Potter out of Lord Ram who resides in the heart of crores of people?

The case in the Supreme Court was no issue of inheritance from any of those “characters”, as the affidavit would describe Lord Ram and others in Ramayan, claimed by their heirs of today. It was an issue of heritage of Lord Ram and Ramayan claimed by Hindu faithfuls – the heritage of Ram Setu – the bridge, they believe, was built by the army of monkeys to cross the seas to Sri Lanka to take on Ravan. But the DMK, a critical UPA partner, is hell-bent on cutting Ram Setu to build the Sethusamudram Channel to create ship-way between Sri Lanka and India.

Ramayan, whether written by Valmiki in Sanskrit or Tulsidas in Hindi or Kamban in Tamil, testifies that Lord Ram’s engineers led by Nal and Neel built the bridge. So, the faithfuls who oppose the Sethusamudram Ship Channel Project that cuts Lord Ram’s bridge, rely on Valmiki’s testimony. They contend that if Ramayan were true, then Ram Setu ought to be true. Consequently, they want Ram Setu to be protected, not destroyed.

They took the case to court. It is there that the UPA Government decided to establish, once and for all, the fact that Ram Setu was no monument. To prove that it took short-cut. If Lord Ram was a mythical character, Ram Setu, too, would be a myth. That is why, on September 9, the Government declared Lord Ram as non-est.

Unfortunately, the UPA Government’s affidavit on Lord Ram as a myth coincided with the pre-fixed VHP agitation on the streets all over the country against the destruction of Ram Setu. So, the issue was already on the streets when the Government filed the explosive affidavit. With the media disclosing the affidavit, there was spontaneous uproar from the people.

The rediff.com, which had put out the news of the affidavit, had opened its website for comments from surfers. In less than 24 hours, over 2,800 surfers responded, with a vast majority of them criticising the Government. Apart from BJP leaders, Mr Prakash Singh Badal and Ms J Jayalalithaa, from the non-saffron ranks, also demanded apology from the Government. Even Mr Lalu Prasad Yadav and Mr AB Bardan condemned the affidavit filed by the Government.

The BJP, as was to be expected, went on a war-mode and demanded the withdrawal of the affidavit, and apology from Ms Sonia Gandhi and Mr Manmohan Singh, besides seeking the removal of the concerned Minister. This forced the Government to began the disowning game.

The Prime Minister told Mr LK Advani that he was not aware of anything about the affidavit. This should be taken as true as Mr Manmohan Singh is unaware of most things in the Government. The Home Minister repeated the same thing; so did the Law Minister. In hours, the affidavit saying Lord Ram was a myth stood orphaned.

Then entered Ms Sonia Gandhi – an ‘expert’ on Lord Ram and Ramayan and also archaeology and history – who, the story goes, called the Additional Solicitor General, Mr Gopal Subramaniam, and disapproved the affidavit declaring Lord Ram as mythical. Mr Subramaniam reported it to the Law Minister, who, in turn, held a Press conference and announced: “Ram is Ram; he exists like Ganga and Himalaya.” So, all experts and their opinions and those of the legal pundits were overruled.

Ms Sonia Gandhi did not even have to use her pen to do it. The UPA’s style of ruling India is self-evident. When the Government does unpopular things, whether it is petrol price hike or affidavit on Lord Ram, Mr Manmohan Singh and company will take the hit. But whenever it does anything popular, like petrol price cut or employment guarantee announcement, or the withdrawal of the affidavit on Lord Ram, Ms Gandhi will take the credit. Now she gets the acclaim for restoring Lord Ram to history from mythology.

It is new experience for Lord Ram. He was exiled by his father, Dasaratha, under the pressure of his aunt, Kaikeyi, for years. But, now, when Lord Ram was declared as non-est by Mr TR Balu, Ms Gandhi overruled him and recovered Lord Ram in just two days. So, Kaikeyi’s wrong to Lord Ram has been atoned by Ms Gandhi, thousands of years later.

Post Script: The experts, who could alone testify on whether Ram Setu is man-made or natural formation, are the geologists and oceanographers, not archaeologists or historians. But their view was totally kept out. Why? Simple. Some of them had already expressed that Ram Setu could not be a natural formation, meaning that it could be man-made – that is, it could be monkey-made.

If the Government had heard them, the results are obvious. There would be no Sethusamudram Ship Channel Project; no contract for Rs 2500 crore; and, no profit to anyone. So the reverse logic – destroy Ram Setu and for that turn Lord Ram into a mythical character.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Walmart in India: High Cost Of Low Prices

Spread The Word











So the monopolizing giant Walmart has finally opened its first store in Amritsar, Bharat (misnomer: India) on May 30, 2009 by the name of "Bharati Wal-Mart". Bharti Walmart is a joint venture between Bharat's Bharti Enterprises Ltd. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) of the U.S. Bharti Enterprises is the parent company of Bharti Airtel Ltd., Bharat's largest mobile company by users. Bharatvaasi (misnomer: Indian citizens) oblivious of the effect of the store on local community and jobs seem to be welcoming it or so reports the sellout biased immoral section of Bharatiya (misnomer: Indian) media.

I ain't supporting no socialists nor communists on this issue, but it is the duty of Government of Bharat, with out their known prejudices against majority community, to protect the local communities, local businesses and see to it that local Walmart employee gets a decent wage with respect.

US has tough Labor Laws and has comparatively much better grievance redressal system to hold companies accountable (irrespective of Company's market size or contacts in the Government) for mistreating their employee. Bharat on the other hand, unfortunately, does not. Government of Bharat has to ensure that Labor Rights of employees are upheld and they are not exploited. There are Environment issues also.

Below are some documentaries about the effect of Walmart on local communities in United States.

Frontline: Is Wal-Mart Good for America? (Official Website)
FRONTLINE explores the relationship between U.S. job losses and the American consumer's insatiable desire for bargains in "Is Wal-Mart Good for America?" Through interviews with retail executives, product manufacturers, economists, and trade experts, correspondent Hedrick Smith examines the growing controversy over the Wal-Mart way of doing business and asks whether a single retail giant has changed the American economy. If copyright becomes an issue on this video upload, it will be deleted immediately.


Walmart: The High Cost Of Low Prices (http://www.walmartmovie.com/)
WAL-MART: THE HIGH COST OF LOW PRICE is a feature length documentary that uncovers a retail giant's assault on families and American values.

The film dives into the deeply personal stories and everyday lives of families and communities struggling to fight a goliath. A working mother is forced to turn to public assistance to provide healthcare for her two small children. A Missouri family loses its business after Wal-Mart is given over $2 million to open its doors down the road. A mayor struggles to equip his first responders after Wal-Mart pulls out and relocates just outside the city limits. A community in California unites, takes on the giant, and wins!


CNBC Originals - The Age of Wal-Mart
The Age of Wal-Mart interviews CEO Lee Scott, explores the circumstances that led founder Sam Walton to create Wal-Mart, highlights the innovation that Wal-Mart has engaged in to apply robotics and logistics in it's mammoth distribution centers is shown, exposes it's business practices in dealing with manufacturers, and shows it's ongoing expansion–now internationally into countries like China.


Some of the related news:
  1. शनिवार को अमृतसर में खुलेगा पहला भारती-वालमार्ट होलसेल स्टोर

  2. अतिरिक्त समाचार के लिए गूगल समाचार पर जाएँ।

  3. Bharti Wal-Mart: To Open 15 Wholesale Stores In 3 Yrs

  4. Cash and carry gains momentum

  5. Wal-Mart makes its India entry

  6. More News from Google News

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Arun Jaitley: Manmohan Singh is best politician

Spread The Word











"Mr Singh has proved a hopeless decision maker as Prime Minister."
- Financial Times, London, April 15 2009

"The Government has assaulted and weakened every constitutional office: the Election Commission, Governors and Parliament."
- Outlook, March 2 2009
Please also read, "Manmohan Singh agrees with Indian Mujahideen terrorists?".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
An excellent interview of Mr. Arun Jaitley by London based Financial Times. He talked on various topics including an Economic Disaster called Manmohan Singh, the incumbent Dhimmi Regent PM and Ottavio Quattrocchi case.

For those who don't understand sarcasm, please don't go running around saying BJP thinks Dhimmi Sardar is a good politician. They don't think so. Mr. Jaitley is just being sarcastic here. Sadly, he is actually pointing out the grim reality of Bharatiya politics that a disaster like this last government and the kind of misgovernance, Anti-Hindu vendetta politics & corruption it has committed, its disgusting that it can still dream of coming back to power. Whats even bad is that gullible citizens of Bharat might just make this nightmare come true.

Following an excerpt from the article.

Interview transcript: BJP’s Arun Jaitley, by James Lamont, the Financial Times’ South Asia bureau chief, and Sunandan Roy Chowdhury in New Delhi on May 7 2009
FT: How do you judge Manmohan Singh’s management of the economy over the past five years?

Jaitley: Manmohan Singh is the best politician India has seen. I can’t say the same about him as an economist.

I think he’s a great politician. He’s never won an election. He doesn’t contest elections. He’s not capable of winning an election. He’s incapable of campaigning. He’s incapable of winning mass activity.

That’s what democracy is about. Without doing any of these things to become a prime minister for five years and aspire for another five years, you have to be an outstanding politician. And then to maintain a Teflon image - I’m not a politician. I think he’s the cleverest post-independence Indian politician.

He’s not a leader. He was a good finance minister. He’s a terrible prime minister. He was a good finance minister because he was executing the policy ideas of another leader Narashima Rao. He just can’t take a decision.

FT: But as an economist?

Academically he knows the subject but he can’t implement what he knows. Because he’s not a leader, he’s a bad implementer of economic decisions. He inherited the economy when the boom period was there from 2004 to 2007. The economy grew because of the impetus from decisions taken from 1991 to 2004. A lot was attributed to global boom and a lot of it was entrepreneur driven. He has been pocketing the credit.

When the crisis came, he collapsed.

And when he collapsed, he collapsed so badly that now he says if I become Prime Minister again in 100 days I will fight the slowdown. That’s always the slogan of the opposition. In the first 100 days I’ll do this. The government in power can’t say this. The government in power has to tell us what it did in the last 100 days. And he won’t tell you a single step he will take in the next 100 days.

FT: What didn’t he achieve?

Jaitley: There was huge potential for infrastructural improvements in India. He picked up the most corrupt people and put them in charge of infrastructure departments as ministers. And that itself has led to a slowdown of infrastructure. Of our highways, our ports. Telecommunications is growing because the economy is growing and the operators are making it grow. But he did his best to prevent it.

For the last 150 days, the country has been without a finance minister. Look at what Barack Obama and Gordon Brown are doing. This man can’t come on television and give a simple economic statement to arouse the confidence of the nation. He can’t appoint a finance minister for 150 days at the peak of the slowdown. A finance ministry official told me there hasn’t been a meeting of the finance ministry officials since 1 December after P. Chidambaram left to decide any issue.

FT: What is your opinion of the Bofors corruption investigation being dropped?

Jaitley: Bofors is the only corruption case in India that has reached the doorstep of the prime minister. The deal was very simple. Trials by the Indian army preferred a French gun. After five trials, it preferred this gun. The sixth trial changed the preference to Bofors.

Before the fifth and sixth trials a company called AE Services entered into a contract with Bofors promising to get them the Indian order on 31/3/86 and being entitled to a kickback. The contract was signed on 24/3/86.

AE Services got the commission. The closest friend of Sonia Gandhi Ottavio Quattrocchi was AE Services. His name being AE Services is proof. The name was conveyed by the Swiss to India in 1993 and the document was given in 1997. According to me, it’s an open and shut case.

FT: But Quattrocchi will go free.

Jaitley: In 1993, he was allowed to escape by a Congress government out of India. His extradition was sought when he was in Malaysia. Malaysia doesn’t cooperate with India over extradition. Extradition is no proof of innocence. Manmohan Singh lied to the whole country when he said he had won the extradition case. Daoud (an fugitive Mumbai mafia boss) isn’t being extradited. That would mean that Daoud is innocent.

So when the Malaysians refused to extradite him. The Indian government moved to the Supreme Court. Between Friday and Monday - there was a weekend - this man absconded for a second time from Malaysia. That’s a victory in his favour. Then he arrested in Argentina. The Argentine court said it was a prima facie case. The government of India must ask the Argentine Supreme Court for permission to bring him to India. The government of India sent a message to the Indian ambassador saying it was a costly exercise therefore we should not pursue this in the Supreme Court. The accounts that were frozen…the Assistant Solicitor General goes to London and tells the Crown prosecutor to release the accounts. That’s the whole case.

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

World Renowned Economist's mad skills EXPOSED!

Spread The Word











"Mr Singh has proved a hopeless decision maker as Prime Minister."
- Financial Times, London, April 15 2009

"The Government has assaulted and weakened every constitutional office: the Election Commission, Governors and Parliament."
- Outlook, March 2 2009
Please also read, "Manmohan Singh agrees with Indian Mujahideen terrorists?".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swiss Bank authorities claim that the Congress led Indian government submitted "forged" documents in the $8 billion Hassan Ali case.

In the following speech, Mr. MR Venkatesh and IIM Bangalore Professor Vaidyanathan explains how Congress led UPA government and its so-called World Renowned Mythical Economist and Dhimmi Regent PM Mr. Manmohan Singh allowed the market to be manipulated and Trillions of USD of Indian citizens money swindled and siphoned out of India.

M.R. Venkatesh speech on Illegal Funds of Indians Abroad - Participatory Notes, conducted by SJM, Swadeshi Jagaran Manch Tamilnadu - Visit: http://mrv.net.in









Professor Vaidyanathan, IIM Bangalore - speech on Illegal funds of Indians abroad - Tax Havens, conducted by SJM, Swadeshi Jagaran Manch Tamilnadu. Visit http://mrv.net.in













Swiss bank: The Big Lie! by Hard News Media
Last week in the Supreme Court, the central government's solicitor, responding to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that demanded government's action on retrieving Indian black money stashed in Swiss banks, had given the names of three Indians and how the agencies were following up on their case.

In a 29-page affidavit, the government had detailed the action it had taken against Pune-based stud farm owner, Hassan Ali Khan, his wife Rheema and Kolkata-based businessman, Kashi Nath Tapuria, who allegedly were holding $8 billion in an UBS account in Switzerland.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED), on its part, has issued a show cause notice to Khan for contravention of Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 after it found out during a raid in January 2007 that Khan had deposited around 8 billion dollars at the UBS Bank. The Income Tax department has raised a total demand of Rs 71,848.59 crore against Khan, his wife Rheema and other associates. Investigations so far have revealed overseas bank accounts of Kashi Nath Tapuria and his wife. The ED has seized their passports.

In a communication from Folco Galli, Information chief of Eidgenössisches Justiz-und Polizeidepartement (EJPD) Bundesamt für Justiz (Swiss Department of Justice and Police) BJ, Berne, Hardnews was informed that the Indian authorities submitted "forged" documents to seek assistance on the Hassan Ali Khan case. Galli's reply to Hardnews on this case is precise and direct and does not need any interpretation. Galli talks about $ 6 billion and not $ 8 billion as it is made out to be. Here is his categorical reply:

"In January 2007, Indian authorities have submitted in the case of Hassan Ali Khan a request for legal assistance to the Federal Office of Justice (FoJ)... In the same month, the FoJ informed the Indian authorities as follows: Concerning the presumed transfer of 6 billion USD, domestic inquiry has revealed that the banking information provided with the request for legal assistance are forged documents. Accordingly, the supposed transfer to UBS accounts has no reality.

Concerning the request Swiss authorities need some specification in order to be able to examine and possibly to accept and execute it:

- a confirmation that the Indian investigation is a criminal one (no tax or related investigation)
- a better description of the predicate offences which are object of the Indian money laundering investigation
- to show the relation between the predicate offences and the accounts in Switzerland... In March 2007, the Indian Embassy submitted some complements to the FoJ.

In April 2007, the FoJ informed the Embassy that the complements don't include the necessary specification. Without these information, Swiss authorities can't examine whether the conditions to grant legal assistance are fulfilled or not. Indian authorities haven't submitted the necessary specification so far."

To reiterate, Galli says the following: first, the documents that were given by Indian authorities were forged and, therefore, the transfer of Indian funds to UBS accounts "has no reality". Swiss authorities want to provide further assistance in that case if the Indian authorities could satisfy the Swiss government's demand to establish dual criminality - what is crime in India is a crime in Switzerland. The Swiss also wanted to know whether Khan's offence was an object of Indian money laundering. Since April 2007, Indian government has not responded to Swiss authorities on this issue.

Interestingly, Supreme Court, too, had asked why the Indian government had not slapped money laundering charges against Khan and Tapuria.

----------deleted-----------
Shocker: Headlines Today steals Hardnews Scoop
Headlines Today, the TV channel of the India Today group, ran a Hardnews exclusive projecting it as their own story -- thus defying all journalistic ethics
Congress Government knew of forged papers sent to Switzerland

India fumbles on black-money trail, Swiss cry foul

“No response to Swiss request”

Indian documents in black money case forged: Swiss government

On trail of black money
The responses from Folco Galli, spokesperson of the Federal Office of Justice, Switzerland, follow:

In January 2007, the Indian government sought legal assistance from the Swiss Federal Office of Justice (FoJ). The same month, FoJ informed India the documents submitted were forged. The case concerned a presumed transfer of 6 billion USD.

The Swiss government asked for specifications to execute India's request. These were: a confirmation that the Indian investigation was a criminal one and not tax related, a better description of the predicate offences which were part of the Indian money-laundering probe and documents to show the relation between predicate offences and the accounts in Switzerland.

Switzerland says that following the queries, India sent some additional information in March 2007.

In April 2007, FoJ informed the Indian embassy that the complements did not include the necessary specifications sought.

Switzerland says India has not submitted the necessary complements yet.

Galli says India submits only a few requests per year for black money investigations
India not keen on black money: Switzerland government

UPA government not serious about recovering black money: BJP

Swiss Government Accuses India of Submitting Forged Documents in Black Money Case

Caution: Following video contains news report from a known Anti-Hindu biased news channel, viewer discretion is advised.





Sunday, March 1, 2009

Narendra Modi Q&A at Symbiosis Management Institute

Spread The Word











Gujarat and Bharat's best Chief Minister Shri Narendra Modi speaks at Symbiosis Institute of Business Management (SIBM), Lavale, Pune on the issues of proactive governance, economics, leadership, management, how to convert recession into opportunity, his RACE formula, Gujarat model, his anti-corruption drives, inclusive growth, etc. He also tells the students during a must watch Question Answers session how he turned the fortunes of the State of Gujarat with his innovative ideas and with the cooperation and the help of his citizens. This is one of the best speech I have heard from Mr. Modi till date after the exemplary rebuttals by him to the biased media at Hindustan Times Leadership Summit in 2007 just before the Assembly elections. What a great Orator!











Saturday, February 28, 2009

Arun Shourie reveals secrets of Congress

Spread The Word











Arun Shourie launches Advani@Campus Programme at JNU

Mr. Arun Shourie interacts with the students at Jawahar Lal Nehru University (JNU) during innovative Advani @ Campus drive to connect with the students. He reveals and I am flabbergasted to know that the Dhimmi Sardar prostrated in front of Hu Jin Tao of China. What a shame! Mr. Shourie talks on Congress's corruption cases, economic crisis, terrorism, dismal infrastructure development, devaluation of important Constitutional posts, etc. He talks on helpless PM's "main ki karaan? Madame se poocho" attitude. He also talks on BJP's plans to fix the economy and secure the nation.

I am shocked to know through Mr. Shourie in these videos that in 2005 Bharat (misnomer: India) constructed only 14 km of Highway under the National Highway Development Project started by Mr. Atal Bihari Vajpayee's NDA government. Shame on this UPA Government and shame on those people who voted for it!

















Gujarat Chief Minister Mr. Narendra Modi on Telangana and economic crisis. The crowd is just amazing.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Erudite speech by LK Advani on Economics and Swadeshi model

Spread The Word











Please read "A Creative Re-Interpretation of Swadeshi" by Offstumped for detailed analysis of Bharat's (misnomer: India) next prospective Prime Minister Mr. Lal Krishna Advani's remarkable speech on Bharatiya (misnomer: Indian) economy, Congress led UPA government's denial of possible recession, despair due to १ Crore job loss in Bharat, unimaginable corruption in government, negligence of Infrastructure development, communal divisive economics of congress, zero policy of Congress towards terrorism & harsh decisions to be taken, decay of Knowledge commission & Human Resource Development Ministry, Marxism, Capitalism, BJP's inclusive development and creative re-interpretation of Swadeshi.

In Mr. Advani's own words,
India needs neither free-for-all capitalism nor freedom-killing communism, but a Swadeshi model of democratic and integral human development grounded in Indian ethos.
For the complete text of his exemplary speech, go to "Advaniji at the 81th Annual General Meeting of the Federation of the Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI)".

Mr. Advani made erudite statements with great mastership and competence about his experience and contribution to Bharat since 1952 while party-hopper inexperienced Raul Vinci aka Rahul Gandhi pompously boasted at some meet in Indraprasth (misnomer: Delhi) about the contribution of his Great Grand-Father Nehru, Grand Mother Indira et al piggybacking on his dynasty. Self made Mr. Advani even knows the names of a small Newspaper/News channel businessman down south in Andhra, I wonder if Raul born with the advantage of proverbial political silver spoon even knows the name of the head of the FICCI, let alone it's board members. Youth doesn't necessarily mean change and experience. Birth based power-hand off and Monarchy is a curse. That is not why Bharat was renamed so from Aryavrat after the founding father of this great tradition, Chakrvarti Maharaj Bharat, son of Shakuntala and Dushyant, during Dwapar Yug (aeon of Mahabharat). जन्म से बड़ा कर्म होता है। Janam se bada Karam hota hai। It is not the Janam (birth/parentage/dynasty) which decides the leader but the Karam (competence/experience/work that you do) of person that makes him a leader.

It's time for Swadeshi. As Mr. Advani says in this speech, it is time to move development and focus from India to Bharat. In my words, from anglicized misnomer India to Dharmic (righteous society) and Vedic (close to God) Bharat.











Saturday, February 7, 2009

Presentation on Economic Slowdown by Dr. Kirit Somaiya

Spread The Word











Presentation by Kirit Somaiya on Economic Slowdown at BJP National Executive, Nagpur, February 2009
Thanks to Offstumped for sharing this presentation. It looks clear to me from the presentation that BJP is certain on what it wants to take to the people of Bharat, one crore of whom have lost their jobs under Congress. On the other hand, it looks like known biased Anti-Hindu Pro-Congress news channels CNNIBN and others are not sure what issue to swamp BJP and Hindus on. They have been attacking Hindus only so many small unjustified issues/things that they themselves look confused on what to pick up next.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Fake currency in India: Rs 169,000 crore

Spread The Word











The Daily Pioneer newspaper in a recent investigation "Fake notes, real problem" has found out that according to a recent Government estimate, counterfeit currency amounting to Rs 169,000 crore is floating around in the Indian financial system.
According to a recent Government estimate, counterfeit currency amounting to Rs 169,000 crore is floating around in the Indian financial system. From real estate transactions to ordinary grocery shopping, these bogus notes are being deployed everyday — sometimes innocently, sometimes with a sinister objective. “In 2008, the CBI registered 13 cases having international/ inter-State ramifications relating to the recovery/ seizure of fake Indian currency notes,” says Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) spokesperson Harsh Bhal.
And there is a terror angle to it too.
In India, counterfeit currency has long been seen as a source of funding for terrorism. Investigations into at least four cases — the Hyderabad bombings of August 2007; the attack on the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, in December 2005; the Ahmedabad bombings of July 2008; and the 26/11 terror attack on Mumbai — revealed a link.
Such currency is also circulated due to sheer negligence of the banking system and lawlessness or lack of implementation of law on the part of the Government.
Dangerously, the counterfeiters have managed to find their way into the official banking system. “Perhaps there is no better way to pummel India’s economy,” says an intelligence official. He explains the modus operandi. Fake currency operatives usually deposit the notes during peak hours when bank tellers are pressed for time and liable to make mistakes.

A few months ago, fake currency amounting to nearly Rs 3 crore was found in the chest of the State Bank of India’s Domariaganj branch in Uttar Pradesh’s Siddarthnagar district. Some fake notes were also found in the currency chest of ICICI Bank’s Sanjay Place branch in Agra. The examples can go on.
The sheer amount of cases registered in first six months of 2008 on fake currency can ring bells for any responsible Government. Not in Bharat, mind you.
According to the National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB), between January and August 2008, 1,170 cases had been registered across the country in connection with fake currency. Bogus notes with a face value of Rs 3.63 crore had been seized. NCRB data shows 2,204 such cases were reported in 2007.
In any other nation, there will be strict action taken by going after the source to see to it that it doesn't happen again. But in Bharat, a debate is done whether or not to throw illegal Bangladeshi out or what to do about Pakistan, should Bharat continue to make music with Pakistani musicians, etc. Why? Because they are Muslim nations.
Intelligence agencies see the counterfeit rupee attack as a form of “economic terrorism”. They have traced many of the fake currency operations back to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and its ancillary crime syndicates such as the Dawood Ibrahim gang. With a multi-layered network in Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, the United Arab Emirates, Sri Lanka and also inside India, counterfeit notes enter India in all three ways — through land, sea and air.

Intelligence officials say the ISI uses terrorist groups such as the Lashkar-e-Tayyeba (LeT), the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM) and the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HuJI) to smuggle and circulate counterfeit currency in India.

A large chunk of fake currency comes in through India’s borders with Pakistan and Bangladesh. The frontier with Pakistan in Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Rajasthan and the porous border with Bangladesh in West Bengal, Assam and the Northeast make for entry points. The Uttar Pradesh-Bihar border with Nepal is another route for the inflow of fake currency.

Sea-borne consignments also turn up in Tamil Nadu (from Sri Lanka) and in Gujarat (from Pakistan). Additionally, bogus notes are flown in from Dubai.

Local criminal networks are activated for the purpose. In Rajasthan, for instance, fake currency operations are closely linked to satta (gambling) and opium smuggling. Indirectly, this drug smuggling ends up financing terrorism in Pakistan.

In Dubai, two key Dawood lieutenants — Aftab Bhakti and Babu Gaithan — run operations. The money is transported to India in regular flights, through ordinary passengers. Indian labourers who work in Dubai are the usual targets. The racketeers focus on those who are in need of money to purchase return tickets. They arrange tickets and ask for a favour: “Deliver our cargo to India.”

The passengers are handed ordinary suitcases, with perhaps perfume bottles and clothes packed inside. A false bottom conceals the fake currency, wrapped in carbon paper or hidden in photo albums. From Dubai, the fake currency consignments reach two major transit points — Mumbai and Hyderabad.
Bharatiya Government doesn't have guts to go after naxal camps in Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Chattisgarh, let alone going after terrorist camps in Pakistan or Bangladesh. So forget about them going after the printing press locations in these countries.
Where are the fake notes printed? A CBI report to the Finance Ministry suggested that the Pakistan Government printing press in Quetta (Baluchistan) was churning out large quantities of counterfeit Indian currency.

Karachi’s security press, and two other presses in Lahore and Peshawar, have also been suspected.

Reports say the paper for the fake notes is sourced from London. Indian investigators also allege the Pakistani Government imports currency-standard printing paper far in excess of official needs. The extra quantum is handed over to the ISI, it is believed.

The fine quality of Pakistan-produced fake currency has alarmed India. Printed on security paper, the sophistication and craftsmanship is of a high order. “Only a specialist can make out the notes as counterfeit,” says an intelligence official. The fake notes duplicate serial numbers and floral designs of genuine notes. In addition, they even have the security wire or “guide wire” — the common man’s mode of authenticating a currency note.
Please go to the article "Fake notes, real problem" to learn how to spot a counterfeit.